Danish Technological Institute

46.4k citations
1.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Danish Technological Institute

1.5k papers receiving 44.5k citations

Peers

Danish Technological Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Building and Construction 7.4k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.9k
  • Pollution 3.1k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 5.6k
  • Automotive Engineering 3.1k
Replace Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy with:
Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy Germany
Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés France
AkzoNobel (Netherlands) Netherlands
Henkel (Germany) Germany
Technology Centre Prague Czechia
Joanneum Research Austria
Evonik (Germany) Germany
Water Research Institute Slovakia
Polytech Lille France
Chr. Hansen (Denmark) Denmark
Danish Technological Institute relative to Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy Germany Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Danish Technological Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Danish Technological Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Danish Technological Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danish Technological Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Danish Technological Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Danish Technological Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Danish Technological Institute at the time of their publication.

About Danish Technological Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Danish Technological Institute have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 46.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 158 papers in Building and Construction, 99 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 27 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 120 papers in Food Science and 152 papers in Mechanics of Materials on the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (77 papers), Concrete and Cement Materials Research (71 papers), Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies (58 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (48 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (45 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (39 papers), Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials (38 papers) and Polymer crystallization and properties (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Building and Construction (7.4k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (2.9k citations), Pollution (3.1k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (5.6k citations) and Automotive Engineering (3.1k citations). Authors at Danish Technological Institute collaborate with scholars in Denmark, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Cement and Concrete Research, Meat Science, Surface and Coatings Technology, CORROSION and International Journal of Refrigeration. Some of Danish Technological Institute's most productive authors include Vagelis G. Papadakis, Aleksey D. Drozdov, S. Chatterji, Gitte Sengeløv, Margit Dall Aaslyng, Richard Buswell, Hans Peter Sørensen, Kim Kusk Mortensen, Scott Z. Jones and Justin Dirrenberger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact