Institute of Modern Physics
Impact in
-
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 1.9k
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 1.9k
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 1.5k
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 1.3k
- Radiation 1.4k
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 883
- Journals
- Physical Review C (836 papers)Physical review. D (545 papers)Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms (423 papers)Chinese Physics Letters (390 papers)Physics Letters B (384 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Institute of Modern Physics
10.9k papers receiving 165.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 61.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 44.1k
- Radiation 11.5k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 10.3k
- Condensed Matter Physics 7.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Modern Physics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Modern Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Modern Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Modern Physics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Modern Physics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Modern Physics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Modern Physics at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Modern Physics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Modern Physics have published 12.1k papers, which have received a total of 171.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.4k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.4k papers in Radiation, 3.4k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 727 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 590 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (1.9k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.9k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.5k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (1.3k papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1.3k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (883 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (608 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (578 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (61.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (44.1k citations), Radiation (11.5k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (10.3k citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (7.8k citations). Authors at Institute of Modern Physics collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review C, Physical review. D, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Chinese Physics Letters and Physics Letters B. Some of Institute of Modern Physics's most productive authors include Xiang Liu, Sen‐Yue Lou, Shi-Lin Zhu, Jun He, Fu-Chen Zhu, Zhao-Qing Feng, Wen‐Li Yang, Qiaoyan Wen, Yu-Gang Ma and You‐Quan Li.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.