International Monetary Fund

424.1k citations
17.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 5.2k
    • Economic Theory and Policy 2.1k
    • Global trade and economics 1.5k
  • Finance 7.9k
    • Global Financial Crisis and Policies 5.6k
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 3.2k

International Monetary Fund

15.8k papers receiving 397.4k citations

Peers

International Monetary Fund
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 170.0k
  • Finance 180.0k
  • Economics and Econometrics 246.7k
  • Accounting 78.3k
  • Development 17.2k
Replace World Bank with:
World Bank United States
Center for Economic and Policy Research United States
Federal Reserve Board of Governors United States
Federal Reserve United States
World Bank Group United States
National Bureau of Economic Research United States
American University United States
Brookings Institution United States
Federal Reserve Bank of New York United States
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States
International Monetary Fund relative to World Bank United States World Bank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
World Bank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at International Monetary Fund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Monetary Fund. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Monetary Fund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Monetary Fund more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at International Monetary Fund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Monetary Fund at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Monetary Fund at the time of their publication.

About International Monetary Fund

In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Monetary Fund have published 17.9k papers, which have received a total of 424.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.7k papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 7.9k papers in Finance, 10.3k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 2.6k papers in Accounting and 621 papers in Development on the topics of Global Financial Crisis and Policies (5.6k papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5.2k papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3.3k papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3.2k papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2.1k papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1.9k papers), Global trade and economics (1.5k papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (1.4k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (170.0k citations), Finance (180.0k citations), Economics and Econometrics (246.7k citations), Accounting (78.3k citations) and Development (17.2k citations). Authors at International Monetary Fund collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of International Money and Finance, Journal of International Economics, Occasional paper, Journal of Development Economics and World Development. Some of International Monetary Fund's most productive authors include Paolo Mauro, Luc Laeven, Raghuram G. Rajan, Carmen Reinhart, Ross Levine, Hans O. Schmitt, Enrica Detragiache, Elhanan Helpman, Asli Demirgüç‐Kunt and Eduardo Borensztein.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact