Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

85k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

2.6k papers receiving 85k citations

Peers

Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Pollution 7.9k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 5.9k
  • Small Animals 5.1k
  • Plant Science 21.5k
  • Soil Science 5.5k
Replace Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech with:
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Belgium
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers France
Agroscope Switzerland
Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institut Agro Dijon France
VetAgro Sup France
Wye College United Kingdom
Harper Adams University United Kingdom
Scotland's Rural College United Kingdom
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail France
Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek relative to Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Belgium Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek at the time of their publication.

About Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 85k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 223 papers in Small Animals, 236 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 726 papers in Plant Science, 31 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology and 191 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (192 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (122 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (110 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (85 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (82 papers), Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (76 papers), Marine and fisheries research (70 papers) and Smart Agriculture and AI (70 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pollution (7.9k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (5.9k citations), Small Animals (5.1k citations), Plant Science (21.5k citations) and Soil Science (5.5k citations). Authors at Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek collaborate with scholars in Belgium, Netherlands and France and have published in prestigious journals including Poultry Science, animal, Nematology, Journal of Dairy Science and Biosystems Engineering. Some of Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek's most productive authors include Frank Tuyttens, Maurice Moens, Marc Heyndrickx, Bart Vandecasteele, Ludwig Lauwers, David R.E. Nuyttens, Isabel Roldán-Ruíz, Nicole M. Viaene, Guido Van Huylenbroeck and Erik Van Bockstaele.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact