International Labour Organization
Impact in
- Public Administration top 2%
- Labor Movements and Unions
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Taxation and Compliance Studies
Papers in
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 182
- Safety Research 204
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare 105
- Top scholars
- Guy StandingKlaus F. ZimmermannGøsta Esping‐AndersenDavid KučeraJukka TakalaLucio BaccaroHedva SarfatiSher Verick
- Journals
- International Labour Review (69 papers)International Social Security Review (61 papers)World Development (29 papers)Transfer European Review of Labour and Research (23 papers)Journal of Glaucoma (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
International Labour Organization
1.7k papers receiving 26.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- Public Administration 2.3k
- Economics and Econometrics 9.3k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.5k
- Business and International Management 581
- Safety Research 2.2k
Countries citing scholars working at International Labour Organization
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Labour Organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Labour Organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Labour Organization more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Labour Organization
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Labour Organization at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Labour Organization at the time of their publication.
About International Labour Organization
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Labour Organization have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 187 papers in Public Administration, 204 papers in Safety Research, 636 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 179 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 32 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Employment and Welfare Studies (273 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (210 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (182 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (155 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (120 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (117 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (105 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (87 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Administration (2.3k citations), Economics and Econometrics (9.3k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (2.5k citations), Business and International Management (581 citations) and Safety Research (2.2k citations). Authors at International Labour Organization collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Labour Review, International Social Security Review, World Development, Transfer European Review of Labour and Research and Journal of Glaucoma. Some of International Labour Organization's most productive authors include Guy Standing, Klaus F. Zimmermann, Gøsta Esping‐Andersen, David Kučera, Jukka Takala, Lucio Baccaro, Hedva Sarfati, Sher Verick, Marco Vivarelli and Wouter van Ginneken.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.