National Heart Institute

42.7k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Heart Institute

932 papers receiving 37.5k citations

Peers

National Heart Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 10.9k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 4.9k
  • Biochemistry 2.0k
  • Surgery 8.5k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 1.3k
Replace Subang Jaya Medical Centre with:
Subang Jaya Medical Centre Malaysia
Hainan Medical College Hospital China
PharmacoGenetics (China) China
Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College Hospital China
The First People's Hospital of Shunde China
Zhongshan People's Hospital China
Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University China
Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command China
Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital China
Institute of Reproductive Medicine India
National Heart Institute relative to Subang Jaya Medical Centre Malaysia Subang Jaya Medical Centre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×86.9×
Subang Jaya Medical Centre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Heart Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Heart Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Heart Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Heart Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Heart Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Heart Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Heart Institute at the time of their publication.

About National Heart Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Heart Institute have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 42.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 356 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 29 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 249 papers in Surgery, 163 papers in Epidemiology and 150 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Congenital Heart Disease Studies (108 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (88 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (58 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (52 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (46 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (46 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (45 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (10.9k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (4.9k citations), Biochemistry (2.0k citations), Surgery (8.5k citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (1.3k citations). Authors at National Heart Institute collaborate with scholars in Malaysia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of Biological Chemistry, International Journal of Cardiology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Some of National Heart Institute's most productive authors include Donald S. Fredrickson, Robert I. Levy, Robert S. Lees, Bernard B. Brodie, Eugene Braunwald, Christian B. Anfinsen, Liese L. Abell, Forrest E. Kendall, Sidney Udenfriend and Albert Sjoerdsma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact