MRC Institute of Hearing Research
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
- Sensory Systems 404
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 394
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 627
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 154
- Neural dynamics and brain function 149
- Top scholars
- Stuart GatehouseQuentin SummerfieldKaren P. SteelAlan R. PalmerMichael A. AkeroydAdrian DavisDavid R. MooreDeborah A. Hall
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (143 papers)Hearing Research (79 papers)International Journal of Audiology (55 papers)Ear and Hearing (45 papers)Clinical Otolaryngology (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
MRC Institute of Hearing Research
1.1k papers receiving 50.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
- Sensory Systems 19.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 31.2k
- Speech and Hearing 8.6k
- Otorhinolaryngology 3.0k
- Neurology 4.2k
Countries citing scholars working at MRC Institute of Hearing Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MRC Institute of Hearing Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MRC Institute of Hearing Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MRC Institute of Hearing Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at MRC Institute of Hearing Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MRC Institute of Hearing Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MRC Institute of Hearing Research at the time of their publication.
About MRC Institute of Hearing Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with MRC Institute of Hearing Research have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 56.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 404 papers in Sensory Systems, 765 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 235 papers in Speech and Hearing, 78 papers in Otorhinolaryngology and 103 papers in Neurology on the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (627 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (394 papers), Noise Effects and Management (233 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (154 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (149 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (101 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (100 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (87 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Sensory Systems (19.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (31.2k citations), Speech and Hearing (8.6k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (3.0k citations) and Neurology (4.2k citations). Authors at MRC Institute of Hearing Research collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, International Journal of Audiology, Ear and Hearing and Clinical Otolaryngology. Some of MRC Institute of Hearing Research's most productive authors include Stuart Gatehouse, Quentin Summerfield, Karen P. Steel, Alan R. Palmer, Michael A. Akeroyd, Adrian Davis, David R. Moore, Deborah A. Hall, William Noble and A. Quentin Summerfield.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.