Institute for Futures Studies

16.7k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

  • Health top 10%
    • Health disparities and outcomes
    • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
    • Migration and Labor Dynamics
    • Climate Change Communication and Perception
    • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Papers in

Institute for Futures Studies

815 papers receiving 14.2k citations

Peers

Institute for Futures Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Health 879
  • Sociology and Political Science 4.7k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.3k
  • Demography 1.0k
  • Safety Research 712
Replace Danish National Centre for Social Research with:
Danish National Centre for Social Research Denmark
Marie Cederschiöld University Sweden
Swedish Defence University Sweden
Centre for Health Equity Studies Sweden
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research Denmark
Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education Norway
Hertie School Germany
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Finland
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Denmark
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Norway
Institute for Futures Studies relative to Danish National Centre for Social Research Denmark Danish National Centre for Social Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Danish National Centre for Social Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Futures Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Futures Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Futures Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Futures Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Futures Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Futures Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Safety Research, 15 papers in General Decision Sciences, 297 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 20 papers in Public Administration and 65 papers in Demography on the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (47 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (47 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (42 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (36 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (34 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (33 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (31 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (879 citations), Sociology and Political Science (4.7k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.3k citations), Demography (1.0k citations) and Safety Research (712 citations). Authors at Institute for Futures Studies collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Futures, Frontiers in Psychology, Philosophical Studies and Demography. Some of Institute for Futures Studies's most productive authors include Joakim Palme, Thomas Niedomysl, Walter Korpi, Arne Jernelöv, Graham R. Marshall, Martin Kolk, Carina Mood, Tobias Hahn, Jan Lisspers and Åke Nygren.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact