Institute for Futures Studies

16.8k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute for Futures Studies

837 papers receiving 14.5k citations

Peers

Institute for Futures Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Health 889
  • Sociology and Political Science 4.8k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.5k
  • Demography 1.0k
  • General Health Professions 2.0k
Replace Danish National Centre for Social Research with:
Danish National Centre for Social Research Denmark
Marie Cederschiöld University Sweden
Swedish Defence University Sweden
Centre for Health Equity Studies Sweden
Institute of Public Affairs Poland
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research Denmark
Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education Norway
Hertie School Germany
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Finland
Center for Social and Economic Research Poland
Institute for Futures Studies relative to Danish National Centre for Social Research Denmark Danish National Centre for Social Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Danish National Centre for Social Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Futures Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Futures Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Futures Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Futures Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Futures Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Futures Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Futures Studies have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 16.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in General Decision Sciences, 80 papers in Safety Research, 303 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 68 papers in Demography and 41 papers in Health on the topics of Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (48 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (45 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (42 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (38 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (37 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (35 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (33 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (889 citations), Sociology and Political Science (4.8k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.5k citations), Demography (1.0k citations) and General Health Professions (2.0k citations). Authors at Institute for Futures Studies collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Futures, Philosophical Studies, Frontiers in Psychology and Economics and Philosophy. Some of Institute for Futures Studies's most productive authors include Joakim Palme, Thomas Niedomysl, Walter Korpi, Arne Jernelöv, Graham R. Marshall, Martin Kolk, Carina Mood, Åke Nygren, Jan Lisspers and Tobias Hahn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact