Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica

15.5k citations
842 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica

771 papers receiving 14.8k citations

Peers

Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Economics and Econometrics 8.0k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.1k
  • Finance 1.7k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 2.1k
  • Accounting 1.3k
Replace Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research with:
Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research Taiwan
Nanhua University Taiwan
Japan University of Economics Japan
East China University of Political Science and Law China
Hunan University of Technology and Business China
Asian Institute of Management Philippines
Korea Development Institute South Korea
Jinwen University of Science and Technology Taiwan
Bank of Korea South Korea
Science and Technology Policy Institute South Korea
Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica relative to Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research Taiwan Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica have published 842 papers, which have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 210 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 567 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 17 papers in General Decision Sciences, 92 papers in Finance and 98 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (161 papers), Economic theories and models (121 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (112 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (98 papers), Global trade and economics (81 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (53 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (46 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (8.0k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (2.1k citations), Finance (1.7k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (2.1k citations) and Accounting (1.3k citations). Authors at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Economics Letters, Journal of Econometrics, International Review of Economics & Finance, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control and Journal of Economics. Some of Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica's most productive authors include Kamhon Kan, Hung‐Jen Wang, Ching‐Cheng Chang, Daigee Shaw, Been-Lon Chen, C. Y. Cyrus Chu, Angus C. Chu, Jin‐Tan Liu, Wen‐Jen Tsay and Ching‐chong Lai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact