D’Or Institute for Research and Education
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Papers in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 78
- Top scholars
- Jorge MollRicardo de Oliveira‐SouzaJorge I. SalluhFernando A. BozzaRoland ZahnMárcio SoaresJordan GrafmanLeonardo F. Fontenelle
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (50 papers)Intensive Care Medicine (36 papers)Critical Care (35 papers)Scientific Reports (34 papers)Journal of Critical Care (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
D’Or Institute for Research and Education
1.7k papers receiving 33.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 3.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.0k
- Biological Psychiatry 592
- Developmental Neuroscience 911
- Clinical Psychology 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at D’Or Institute for Research and Education
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at D’Or Institute for Research and Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at D’Or Institute for Research and Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D’Or Institute for Research and Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at D’Or Institute for Research and Education
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with D’Or Institute for Research and Education at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with D’Or Institute for Research and Education at the time of their publication.
About D’Or Institute for Research and Education
In recent decades, authors affiliated with D’Or Institute for Research and Education have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 117 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 28 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 44 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 193 papers in Clinical Psychology and 278 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (114 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (89 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (78 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (50 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (49 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (49 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (47 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (3.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (592 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (911 citations) and Clinical Psychology (4.1k citations). Authors at D’Or Institute for Research and Education collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care, Scientific Reports and Journal of Critical Care. Some of D’Or Institute for Research and Education's most productive authors include Jorge Moll, Ricardo de Oliveira‐Souza, Jorge I. Salluh, Fernando A. Bozza, Roland Zahn, Márcio Soares, Jordan Grafman, Leonardo F. Fontenelle, Frank Krüeger and Ivanei E. Bramati.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.