Instituto de Ciencias Forestales

12.8k citations
449 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Instituto de Ciencias Forestales

426 papers receiving 12.3k citations

Peers

Instituto de Ciencias Forestales
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.6k
  • Soil Science 1.9k
  • Ecology 3.0k
  • Insect Science 1.3k
Replace Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies with:
Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies Spain
Interaction Sol Plante Atmosphère France
Ecosystem (Spain) Spain
Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble France
Dynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers France
Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural Spain
Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre en Environnement Fluctuant France
Office National des Forêts France
Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux France
Ecology and Ecosystem Health France
Instituto de Ciencias Forestales relative to Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies Spain Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituto de Ciencias Forestales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto de Ciencias Forestales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto de Ciencias Forestales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto de Ciencias Forestales more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto de Ciencias Forestales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto de Ciencias Forestales at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto de Ciencias Forestales at the time of their publication.

About Instituto de Ciencias Forestales

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto de Ciencias Forestales have published 449 papers, which have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 169 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 227 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 50 papers in Soil Science, 60 papers in Insect Science and 114 papers in Ecology on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (118 papers), Forest ecology and management (107 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (79 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (67 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (52 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (46 papers), Forest Management and Policy (45 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (5.6k citations), Soil Science (1.9k citations), Ecology (3.0k citations) and Insect Science (1.3k citations). Authors at Instituto de Ciencias Forestales collaborate with scholars in Spain, France and Indonesia and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Annals of Forest Science, Forests, European Journal of Forest Research and The Science of The Total Environment. Some of Instituto de Ciencias Forestales's most productive authors include Cristina Fernández, José A. Vega, Rafael Zas, Ismael Aranda, Luís Sampedro, Teresa Fontúrbel, Xoaquín Moreira, Luis Gil, José Alberto Ramírez‐Valiente and Estrella Cadahía.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact