Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Immunology top 10%
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Papers in
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 357
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 139
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 116
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 104
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 93
- Top scholars
- Kay‐Hooi KhooAndrew H.‐J. WangPo‐Huang LiangTzu‐Ping KoShui‐Tein ChenShih‐Hsiung WuMing‐Daw TsaiInn‐Ho Tsai
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (144 papers)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (101 papers)Nature Communications (76 papers)Scientific Reports (68 papers)PLoS ONE (61 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica
3.0k papers receiving 91.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Molecular Biology 52.6k
- Immunology 11.6k
- Biotechnology 4.1k
- Cancer Research 5.8k
- Cell Biology 5.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 95.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.0k papers in Molecular Biology, 24 papers in Structural Biology, 139 papers in Biotechnology, 304 papers in Immunology and 423 papers in Organic Chemistry on the topics of Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (357 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (256 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (185 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (157 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (139 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (116 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (104 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (93 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (52.6k citations), Immunology (11.6k citations), Biotechnology (4.1k citations), Cancer Research (5.8k citations) and Cell Biology (5.3k citations). Authors at Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE. Some of Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica's most productive authors include Kay‐Hooi Khoo, Andrew H.‐J. Wang, Po‐Huang Liang, Tzu‐Ping Ko, Shui‐Tein Chen, Shih‐Hsiung Wu, Ming‐Daw Tsai, Inn‐Ho Tsai, Shyh‐Horng Chiou and Ruey‐Hwa Chen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.