J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)

6.1k citations
253 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)

219 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Polymers and Plastics 1.1k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 159
  • Biomaterials 550
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 556
  • Pollution 207
Replace LIM College with:
LIM College United States
Collège de Maisonneuve Canada
Coppin State University United States
Gaylord Hospital United States
Owens-Illinois (United States) United States
Wilson Community College United States
Algonquin College Canada
Allegheny Intermediate Unit United States
Link Foundation United States
Phipps Houses United States
J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) relative to LIM College United States LIM College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31.8×
LIM College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at J.M. Huber Corporation (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) at the time of their publication.

About J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) have published 253 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 2 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 16 papers in Biomaterials, 1 paper in Acoustics and Ultrasonics and 13 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (31 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (20 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (14 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (11 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (8 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (7 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (7 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (1.1k citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (159 citations), Biomaterials (550 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (556 citations) and Pollution (207 citations). Authors at J.M. Huber Corporation (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Circulation, Carbon, Clays and Clay Minerals and Soil Science Society of America Journal. Some of J.M. Huber Corporation (United States)'s most productive authors include Victoria J. Marsick, Karen E. Watkins, A. K. Sircar, Andries Voet, T. G. Lamond, R. M. Weaver, M. Kazayawoko, John J. Balatinecz, Paul R. Bloom and Laurent M. Matuana.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact