Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute

9.1k citations
304 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute

288 papers receiving 8.9k citations

Peers

Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Developmental Biology 890
  • Ecology 5.6k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.4k
  • Aquatic Science 1.4k
  • Physiology 599
Replace Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission with:
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission United States
Allan Hancock College United States
Mill Valley Public Library United States
California Sea Grant United States
H.T. Harvey & Associates United States
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources United States
Los Angeles County Museum of Art United States
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation United States
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History United States
Klamath Community College United States
Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute relative to Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission United States Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute have published 304 papers, which have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 70 papers in Aquatic Science, 20 papers in Developmental Biology, 37 papers in Physiology, 175 papers in Ecology and 58 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Marine animal studies overview (121 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (62 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (38 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (38 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (37 papers), Marine and fisheries research (35 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (32 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (890 citations), Ecology (5.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k citations), Aquatic Science (1.4k citations) and Physiology (599 citations). Authors at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Aquaculture, Marine Mammal Science, Ornithological Applications and Journal of Wildlife Diseases. Some of Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute's most productive authors include Brent S. Stewart, Mark Drawbridge, Scott A. Eckert, Joseph R. Jehl, Nélio B. Barros, Robert L. DeLong, Kevin Stuart, Randall S. Wells, Terrie M. Williams and Ann E. Bowles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact