HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Impact in
- Marketing top 5%
- Environmental Sustainability in Business
Papers in
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 60
- Top scholars
- Wim VerbekeIris VermeirMike WrightStijn BlotStefaan De HenauwMohamed LamkanfiYvan SaeysWouter Saelens
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (61 papers)PLoS ONE (47 papers)Public Health Nutrition (32 papers)Journal of Voice (29 papers)BMC Public Health (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts
5.2k papers receiving 156.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
- Marketing 4.5k
- Business and International Management 995
- Cognitive Neuroscience 8.8k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 3.6k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 5.8k
Countries citing scholars working at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts at the time of their publication.
About HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts
In recent decades, authors affiliated with HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 175.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 68 papers in Public Administration, 69 papers in Sensory Systems, 284 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 171 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 163 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Natural Language Processing Techniques (83 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (64 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (64 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (60 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (58 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (58 papers), Topic Modeling (57 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (4.5k citations), Business and International Management (995 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (8.8k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (3.6k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (5.8k citations). Authors at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts collaborate with scholars in Belgium, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Public Health Nutrition, Journal of Voice and BMC Public Health. Some of HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts's most productive authors include Wim Verbeke, Iris Vermeir, Mike Wright, Stijn Blot, Stefaan De Henauw, Mohamed Lamkanfi, Yvan Saeys, Wouter Saelens, Johan van Braak and Jan De Houwer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.