Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

3.3k papers receiving 141.3k citations

Peers

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3.1k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 11.3k
  • Family Practice 2.6k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 5.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 28.6k
Replace New York Hospital Queens with:
New York Hospital Queens United States
McGill University Health Centre Canada
Yale New Haven Hospital United States
Massachusetts Department of Public Health United States
Harvard Global Health Institute United States
Mass General Brigham United States
Hartford Hospital United States
Weill Cornell Medicine United States
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Canada
Baystate Medical Center United States
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care relative to New York Hospital Queens United States New York Hospital Queens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
New York Hospital Queens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard Pilgrim Health Care more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care at the time of their publication.

About Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 202.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 74 papers in Family Practice, 229 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 61 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 174 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (196 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (183 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (170 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (165 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (155 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (103 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (100 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (98 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (3.1k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (11.3k citations), Family Practice (2.6k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (5.3k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (28.6k citations). Authors at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PEDIATRICS, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Journal of General Internal Medicine and JAMA Network Open. Some of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care's most productive authors include Matthew W. Gillman, Emily Oken, Sheryl L. Rifas‐Shiman, Ken Kleinman, Stephen B. Soumerai, Michael Klompas, Dennis Ross‐Degnan, Elsie M. Taveras, Janet W. Rich‐Edwards and Richard Platt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact