Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Archeology top 10%
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Archaeological and Historical Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 312
- Classical Antiquity Studies 224
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 57
- Historical and Literary Studies 24
- Archeology 265
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 109
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 94
- Archaeological and Historical Studies 69
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 28
- Top scholars
- Agnès LamotteAlain TuffreauStéphane BenoistArthur MüllerVéronique ChankowskiSanda BalescuMarie‐Hélène MoncelDavid Hérisson
In The Last Decade
Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens
427 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Anthropology 1.1k
- Archeology 569
- Archeology 44
- Paleontology 237
- Space and Planetary Science 20
Countries citing scholars working at Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens at the time of their publication.
About Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens have published 572 papers, which have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 312 papers in Anthropology, 265 papers in Archeology, 12 papers in Archeology, 5 papers in Space and Planetary Science and 43 papers in Paleontology on the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (224 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (109 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (94 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (69 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (57 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (39 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (28 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Anthropology (1.1k citations), Archeology (569 citations), Archeology (44 citations), Paleontology (237 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (20 citations). Authors at Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens collaborate with scholars in France, Greece and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, Quaternary International, Pallas, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz and L Anthropologie. Some of Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens's most productive authors include Agnès Lamotte, Alain Tuffreau, Stéphane Benoist, Arthur Müller, Véronique Chankowski, Sanda Balescu, Marie‐Hélène Moncel, David Hérisson, Pierre Antoine and Patrick Auguste.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.