Gulliver

16.8k citations
494 papers ·

Impact in

    • Micro and Nano Robotics
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Papers in

Gulliver

458 papers receiving 16.3k citations

Peers

Gulliver
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Condensed Matter Physics 2.9k
  • Biomedical Engineering 5.5k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.1k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.4k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 665
Replace Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute with:
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute Netherlands
Délégation Ile-de-France Villejuif France
Laboratoire Jean Perrin France
Centre de Haute Energie France
Institute of Polymers Switzerland
Entwicklungszentrum für Schiffstechnik und Transportsysteme Germany
Element Six (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique - Approche Multi-échelle des Milieux Complexes France
Max Planck University of Twente Center for Complex Fluid Dynamics Netherlands
Laboratoire du Futur France
Gulliver relative to Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute Netherlands Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.8×
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Gulliver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Gulliver. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Gulliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gulliver more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Gulliver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Gulliver at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Gulliver at the time of their publication.

About Gulliver

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Gulliver have published 494 papers, which have received a total of 16.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 137 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 61 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 25 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 31 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 150 papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Material Dynamics and Properties (81 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (73 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (64 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (50 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (49 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (47 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (43 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (2.9k citations), Biomedical Engineering (5.5k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.1k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.4k citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (665 citations). Authors at Gulliver collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Soft Matter, Physical review. E, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Lab on a Chip. Some of Gulliver's most productive authors include Armand Ajdari, Olivier Dauchot, Florent Krząkała, Pierre Sens, Ludwik Leibler, Martin Z. Bazant, Lydéric Bocquet, L. Zdeborová, Teresa López‐León and Mustafa Sabri Kilic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact