Global Brain Health Institute

48.0k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Global Brain Health Institute

1.6k papers receiving 35.1k citations

Peers

Global Brain Health Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Infectious Diseases 6.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 7.7k
  • Health 2.0k
  • General Health Professions 5.7k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 3.6k
Replace California Department of Public Health with:
California Department of Public Health United States
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital United States
Milken Institute United States
Department of Health Services United States
Fielding Graduate University United States
California Health and Human Services Agency United States
Olive View-UCLA Medical Center United States
Berkeley Public Health Division United States
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health United States
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital United States
Global Brain Health Institute relative to California Department of Public Health United States California Department of Public Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
California Department of Public Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Global Brain Health Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Global Brain Health Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Global Brain Health Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Brain Health Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Global Brain Health Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Global Brain Health Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Global Brain Health Institute at the time of their publication.

About Global Brain Health Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Global Brain Health Institute have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 48.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 268 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 298 papers in Infectious Diseases, 92 papers in Health, 300 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 253 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (224 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (199 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (141 papers), Malaria Research and Control (114 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (111 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (82 papers), Sex work and related issues (63 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (60 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (6.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (7.7k citations), Health (2.0k citations), General Health Professions (5.7k citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.6k citations). Authors at Global Brain Health Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland and have published in prestigious journals including Alzheimer s & Dementia, PLoS ONE, Malaria Journal, AIDS and Behavior and Scientific Reports. Some of Global Brain Health Institute's most productive authors include Richard Feachem, Hacsi Horváth, George W. Rutherford, Roly Gosling, Andrew Anglemyer, Agustín Ibáñez, John Peabody, H. S. Kaye, R. Joseph and A.S. Verkman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact