Global Academy of Technology

364 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Global Academy of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Health Information Management 110
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 293
  • Artificial Intelligence 447
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 207
  • Computer Networks and Communications 255
Replace Jeppiaar Engineering College with:
Jeppiaar Engineering College India
Open International University for Alternative Medicines India
HKBK College of Engineering India
E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College India
SRKR Engineering College India
Government College of Engineering, Tirunelveli India
Kanyakumari Government Medical College India
Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology India
Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology India
Healthcare Global Enterprises India
Global Academy of Technology relative to Jeppiaar Engineering College India Jeppiaar Engineering College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jeppiaar Engineering College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Global Academy of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Global Academy of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Global Academy of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Academy of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Global Academy of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Global Academy of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Global Academy of Technology at the time of their publication.

About Global Academy of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Global Academy of Technology have published 476 papers, which have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 25 papers in Health Information Management, 81 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 98 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 64 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 14 papers in Ceramics and Composites on the topics of Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (29 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (24 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (22 papers), AI in cancer detection (20 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (19 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (16 papers), Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (15 papers) and Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Information Management (110 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (293 citations), Artificial Intelligence (447 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (207 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (255 citations). Authors at Global Academy of Technology collaborate with scholars in India, Cyprus and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Coastal Research, Wireless Personal Communications, Fibers and Polymers, Materials Today Proceedings and Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. Some of Global Academy of Technology's most productive authors include Ashwini Kodipalli, T. N. Ravishankar, T. Ramakrishnappa, Roshan Joy Martis, Sérgio R. Teixeira, Jobish Johns, Trupthi Rao, Steven Lawrence Fernandes, Jaı̈rton Dupont and S Kumaraswamy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact