Fuzhou University

1.1M citations
44.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fuzhou University

38.6k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Peers

Fuzhou University
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 283.7k
  • Materials Chemistry 421.2k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 86.3k
  • Catalysis 40.8k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 275.9k
Replace Xiamen University with:
Xiamen University China
Zhejiang University of Technology China
East China University of Science and Technology China
Soochow University China
Nanjing Tech University China
Shanghai University China
Jiangsu University China
Nanjing University of Science and Technology China
Hunan University China
Wuhan University of Technology China
Fuzhou University relative to Xiamen University China Xiamen University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xiamen University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fuzhou University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fuzhou University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fuzhou University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fuzhou University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fuzhou University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fuzhou University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fuzhou University at the time of their publication.

About Fuzhou University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fuzhou University have published 44.1k papers, which have received a total of 1.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.9k papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 10.2k papers in Materials Chemistry, 1.3k papers in Catalysis, 2.3k papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 9.5k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (3.3k papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1.7k papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (1.5k papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (1.4k papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (1.2k papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (1.2k papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (1.1k papers) and Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (1.0k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (283.7k citations), Materials Chemistry (421.2k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (86.3k citations), Catalysis (40.8k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (275.9k citations). Authors at Fuzhou University collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Hong Kong and have published in prestigious journals including Chemical Engineering Journal, RSC Advances, Chemical Communications, Journal of Materials Chemistry A and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Some of Fuzhou University's most productive authors include Xinchen Wang, Yi‐Jun Xu, Hanqiu Xu, Xianzhi Fu, Guonan Chen, Dianping Tang, Huanghao Yang, Nan Zhang, Zi‐Rong Tang and Zhaohui Li.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact