Federal University of Technology

144.1k citations
11.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Federal University of Technology

10.5k papers receiving 144k citations

Peers

Federal University of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Food Science 10.5k
  • Biochemistry 3.8k
  • Modeling and Simulation 2.6k
  • Horticulture 257
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 5.3k
Replace University of Ilorin with:
University of Ilorin Nigeria
Université de Dschang Cameroon
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta Nigeria
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Nigeria
Federal University of Technology Owerri Nigeria
Bayero University Kano Nigeria
Landmark University Nigeria
Covenant University Nigeria
University of Ngaoundéré Cameroon
Federal University of Technology Minna Nigeria
Federal University of Technology relative to University of Ilorin Nigeria University of Ilorin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
University of Ilorin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal University of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal University of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal University of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal University of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal University of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal University of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal University of Technology at the time of their publication.

About Federal University of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal University of Technology have published 11.7k papers, which have received a total of 144.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 42 papers in Horticulture, 806 papers in Food Science, 587 papers in Building and Construction, 387 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 203 papers in Biochemistry on the topics of Food and Agricultural Sciences (386 papers), Food composition and properties (268 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (234 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (184 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (181 papers), Medicinal Plant Research (175 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (169 papers) and Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (165 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Food Science (10.5k citations), Biochemistry (3.8k citations), Modeling and Simulation (2.6k citations), Horticulture (257 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (5.3k citations). Authors at Federal University of Technology collaborate with scholars in Nigeria, South Africa and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Food Biochemistry, Heliyon, Scientific Reports, Scientific African and Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. Some of Federal University of Technology's most productive authors include Ganiyu Oboh, Isaac Lare Animasaun, Kenneth Kanayo Alaneme, Kolade Matthew Owolabi, Adedayo Oluwaseun Ademiluyi, Stephen Adeniyi Adefegha, Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke, Ayokunle Olubode Ademosun, Afolabi Akintunde Akindahunsi and Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact