Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura

9.7k citations
381 papers ·

Impact in

  • Horticulture top 0.5%
    • Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
    • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences

Papers in

    • Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy 88
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 63
    • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 47

Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura

357 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Peers

Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Horticulture 2.0k
  • Insect Science 2.9k
  • Plant Science 7.9k
  • Cell Biology 1.6k
  • Biochemistry 191
Replace Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz with:
Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz Brazil
Biotech (Brazil) Brazil
Bio-Bras Brazil
Centro de Excelência em Bioinformática Brazil
Centro Universitário Filadélfia Brazil
Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos Brazil
Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca Uruguay
Serviço Autônomo de Água e Esgoto de Jaboticabal Brazil
Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná Brazil
Associação Brasileira da Batata Brazil
Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura relative to Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz Brazil Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×45.0×
Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura at the time of their publication.

About Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura have published 381 papers, which have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 88 papers in Horticulture, 111 papers in Insect Science, 327 papers in Plant Science, 84 papers in Cell Biology and 7 papers in Forestry on the topics of Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (202 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (118 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (88 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (83 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (71 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (63 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (47 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (2.0k citations), Insect Science (2.9k citations), Plant Science (7.9k citations), Cell Biology (1.6k citations) and Biochemistry (191 citations). Authors at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Disease, Plant Pathology, Crop Protection, European Journal of Plant Pathology and Frontiers in Plant Science. Some of Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura's most productive authors include Renato Beozzo Bassanezi, Franklin Behlau, S. A. Lopes, A. J. Ayres, José Belasque, Lílian Amorim, Pedro Takao Yamamoto, Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda, D. C. Teixeira and Leandro Peña.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact