Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
Impact in
- Horticulture top 0.5%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Papers in
- Horticulture 88
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy 88
- Insect Science 113
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 67
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 45
- Top scholars
- Renato Beozzo BassaneziFranklin BehlauS. A. LopesA. J. AyresJosé BelasqueLílian AmorimPedro Takao YamamotoMarcelo Pedreira de Miranda
- Journals
- Plant Disease (41 papers)Plant Pathology (21 papers)Crop Protection (18 papers)European Journal of Plant Pathology (14 papers)Pest Management Science (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
343 papers receiving 8.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Horticulture 2.0k
- Insect Science 2.8k
- Plant Science 7.4k
- Cell Biology 1.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 599
Countries citing scholars working at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura at the time of their publication.
About Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura have published 362 papers, which have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 88 papers in Horticulture, 113 papers in Insect Science, 321 papers in Plant Science, 82 papers in Cell Biology and 7 papers in Forestry on the topics of Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (197 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (120 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (88 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (81 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (70 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (67 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (45 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (2.0k citations), Insect Science (2.8k citations), Plant Science (7.4k citations), Cell Biology (1.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (599 citations). Authors at Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Disease, Plant Pathology, Crop Protection, European Journal of Plant Pathology and Pest Management Science. Some of Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura's most productive authors include Renato Beozzo Bassanezi, Franklin Behlau, S. A. Lopes, A. J. Ayres, José Belasque, Lílian Amorim, Pedro Takao Yamamoto, Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda, Leandro Peña and D. C. Teixeira.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.