Forest Research Institute

66.6k citations
3.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Forest Research Institute

3.1k papers receiving 62.9k citations

Peers

Forest Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.3k
  • Insect Science 8.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 12.3k
  • Plant Science 19.8k
  • Ecology 13.6k
Replace Indian Council of Agricultural Research with:
Indian Council of Agricultural Research India
Punjab Agricultural University India
National Botanical Research Institute India
Indian Agricultural Research Institute India
Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Pakistan
Agriculture and Forestry University Nepal
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir India
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council Pakistan
Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry India
Indian Institute of Toxicology Research India
Forest Research Institute relative to Indian Council of Agricultural Research India Indian Council of Agricultural Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Indian Council of Agricultural Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Forest Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Forest Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Forest Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Forest Research Institute have published 3.6k papers, which have received a total of 66.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 610 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.3k papers in Plant Science, 391 papers in Insect Science, 119 papers in Forestry and 526 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Forest ecology and management (384 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (226 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (224 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (198 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (172 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (141 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (140 papers) and Wood Treatment and Properties (139 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.3k citations), Insect Science (8.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (12.3k citations), Plant Science (19.8k citations) and Ecology (13.6k citations). Authors at Forest Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Pathology, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, Journal of Forestry Research and Forest Ecology and Management. Some of Forest Research Institute's most productive authors include Roger G. Pertwee, Erik Christiansen, Hukum Singh, Halvor Solheim, Paal Krokene, M. P. Mosley, Vincent R. Franceschi, Vineet Kumar, Trygve Krekling and Manoj Kumar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact