Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Forestry top 5%
- African Botany and Ecology Studies
Papers in
- Horticulture 27
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy 27
- Forestry 60
- African Botany and Ecology Studies 53
- Top scholars
- William Kwadwo DumenuElizabeth Asantewaa ObengStephen Adu‐BreduLawrence DamnyagEmmanuel Opuni‐FrimpongLuke C. N. AnglaaereMichael SwaineBoateng Kyereh
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (20 papers)Trees Forests and People (9 papers)New Forests (8 papers)Forests (7 papers)The International Forestry Review (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GhanaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
312 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Horticulture 429
- Forestry 835
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
- Global and Planetary Change 3.0k
- Ecological Modeling 370
Countries citing scholars working at Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Forestry Research Institute of Ghana. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Forestry Research Institute of Ghana with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forestry Research Institute of Ghana more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Forestry Research Institute of Ghana at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Forestry Research Institute of Ghana at the time of their publication.
About Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Forestry Research Institute of Ghana have published 348 papers, which have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 27 papers in Horticulture, 60 papers in Forestry, 106 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 145 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 20 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (70 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (64 papers), Forest ecology and management (56 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (53 papers), Forest Management and Policy (32 papers), Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (27 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (429 citations), Forestry (835 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.0k citations) and Ecological Modeling (370 citations). Authors at Forestry Research Institute of Ghana collaborate with scholars in Ghana, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Trees Forests and People, New Forests, Forests and The International Forestry Review. Some of Forestry Research Institute of Ghana's most productive authors include William Kwadwo Dumenu, Elizabeth Asantewaa Obeng, Stephen Adu‐Bredu, Lawrence Damnyag, Emmanuel Opuni‐Frimpong, Luke C. N. Anglaaere, Michael Swaine, Boateng Kyereh, Shalom D. Addo‐Danso and Mark Appiah.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.