Federal Office of Public Health

26.2k citations
742 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Federal Office of Public Health

721 papers receiving 26.2k citations

Peers

Federal Office of Public Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 696
  • Infectious Diseases 3k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.1k
  • Chemical Health and Safety 112
  • Food Science 2.7k
Replace Laboratoire National de Santé with:
Laboratoire National de Santé Luxembourg
European Food Safety Authority Italy
LGC United Kingdom
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs United Kingdom
National Institute of Public Health Slovenia
Center for Sepsis Control and Care Germany
European Union Belgium
Ministero della Salute Italy
Department of Health and Social Care United Kingdom
Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé Luxembourg
Federal Office of Public Health relative to Laboratoire National de Santé Luxembourg Laboratoire National de Santé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34.8×
Laboratoire National de Santé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Office of Public Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Office of Public Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Office of Public Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Office of Public Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Office of Public Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Office of Public Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Office of Public Health at the time of their publication.

About Federal Office of Public Health

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Office of Public Health have published 742 papers, which have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 7 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 109 papers in Infectious Diseases, 43 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 18 papers in Microbiology on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (41 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (41 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (35 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (33 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (27 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (21 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (20 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (696 citations), Infectious Diseases (3k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.1k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (112 citations) and Food Science (2.7k citations). Authors at Federal Office of Public Health collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Eurosurveillance, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, AIDS and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Some of Federal Office of Public Health's most productive authors include Josef R. Schlatter, B. Zimmerli, Max Haldimann, A. Baumgärtner, Jürg A. Zarn, Beat Johannes Brüschweiler, Jean Lindenmann, Otmar Zoller, Werner K. Lutz and Virginie Masserey Spicher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact