National Research Fund Luxembourg
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
-
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction
Papers in
- Philosophy 61
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 44
- Top scholars
- Marius GilbertCatherine LinardAndrew J. TatemThomas P. Van BoeckelAndrea Elizabeth GaughanAndre E. LambertAlain F. JunodAlbert E. Renold
- Journals
- International Journal of Quantum Chemistry (13 papers)European Journal of Immunology (13 papers)PLoS ONE (10 papers)Allergy (9 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- LuxembourgBelgiumFrance
In The Last Decade
National Research Fund Luxembourg
1.0k papers receiving 26.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
- Modeling and Simulation 640
- Immunology 2.7k
- Instrumentation 437
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.7k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
Countries citing scholars working at National Research Fund Luxembourg
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Research Fund Luxembourg. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Research Fund Luxembourg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Research Fund Luxembourg more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Research Fund Luxembourg
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Research Fund Luxembourg at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Research Fund Luxembourg at the time of their publication.
About National Research Fund Luxembourg
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Research Fund Luxembourg have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 28.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 61 papers in Philosophy, 44 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 25 papers in Urban Studies, 75 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 19 papers in History and Philosophy of Science on the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (44 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (30 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (28 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (27 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (26 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (26 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (26 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (640 citations), Immunology (2.7k citations), Instrumentation (437 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.7k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations). Authors at National Research Fund Luxembourg collaborate with scholars in Luxembourg, Belgium and France and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, European Journal of Immunology, PLoS ONE, Allergy and Journal of Biological Chemistry. Some of National Research Fund Luxembourg's most productive authors include Marius Gilbert, Catherine Linard, Andrew J. Tatem, Thomas P. Van Boeckel, Andrea Elizabeth Gaughan, Andre E. Lambert, Alain F. Junod, Albert E. Renold, Werner Stauffacher and Forrest Robert Stevens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.