Fetal Medicine Foundation
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 60
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 87
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 43
- Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders 43
- Top scholars
- K. H. NicolaidesLawrence G. LenkeKeith H. BridwellGordon WaddellGreggory R. DeVoreMichael R. HarrisonSteven J. LintonTherése Andersson
- Journals
- Spine (84 papers)Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy (63 papers)Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (25 papers)Prenatal Diagnosis (21 papers)The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Fetal Medicine Foundation
485 papers receiving 15.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.3k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 3.7k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 3.3k
- Surgery 6.0k
- Pharmacology 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Fetal Medicine Foundation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fetal Medicine Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fetal Medicine Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fetal Medicine Foundation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fetal Medicine Foundation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fetal Medicine Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fetal Medicine Foundation at the time of their publication.
About Fetal Medicine Foundation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fetal Medicine Foundation have published 630 papers, which have received a total of 18.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 81 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 149 papers in Surgery, 56 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 55 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (87 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (60 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (45 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (43 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (43 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (34 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (30 papers) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.3k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.7k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.3k citations), Surgery (6.0k citations) and Pharmacology (1.3k citations). Authors at Fetal Medicine Foundation collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Spine, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis and The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. Some of Fetal Medicine Foundation's most productive authors include K. H. Nicolaides, Lawrence G. Lenke, Keith H. Bridwell, Gordon Waddell, Greggory R. DeVore, Michael R. Harrison, Steven J. Linton, Therése Andersson, Hans‐Joachim Wilke and L. Claes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.