Florida Institute of Technology

228.2k citations
9.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Florida Institute of Technology

8.6k papers receiving 218.9k citations

Peers

Florida Institute of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Modeling and Simulation 10.3k
  • Numerical Analysis 10.6k
  • Applied Mathematics 19.3k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 20.1k
  • Oceanography 12.2k
Replace Florida Atlantic University with:
Florida Atlantic University United States
Florida International University United States
Mississippi State University United States
William & Mary United States
Old Dominion University United States
Georgia Southern University United States
George Mason University United States
University of Alabama in Huntsville United States
U.S. National Science Foundation United States
AT&T (United States) United States
Florida Institute of Technology relative to Florida Atlantic University United States Florida Atlantic University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.6×
Florida Atlantic University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Florida Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Florida Institute of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Florida Institute of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florida Institute of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Florida Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Florida Institute of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Florida Institute of Technology at the time of their publication.

About Florida Institute of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Florida Institute of Technology have published 9.6k papers, which have received a total of 228.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 374 papers in Numerical Analysis, 670 papers in Applied Mathematics, 760 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 438 papers in Oceanography and 152 papers in Modeling and Simulation on the topics of Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (419 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (281 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (265 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (235 papers), Marine and fisheries research (228 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (214 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (209 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (200 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (10.3k citations), Numerical Analysis (10.6k citations), Applied Mathematics (19.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (20.1k citations) and Oceanography (12.2k citations). Authors at Florida Institute of Technology collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Ireland and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Nonlinear Analysis, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. Some of Florida Institute of Technology's most productive authors include Virender K. Sharma, Vangipuram Lakshmikantham, Ravi P. Agarwal, Philip K. Chan, Laurene V. Fausett, Mark B. Bush, Joseph Dwyer, Robert van Woesik, Mary Sohn and Werner C. Rheinboldt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact