Royal Academy of Engineering
Impact in
-
- Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
-
- Numerical methods in engineering
Papers in
-
- Engineering Education and Curriculum Development 5
- Top scholars
- Emílio CustódioAndrew ChilversAdisa AzapagicHarish Kumar JeswaniBrian SheilEric C. KerriganStéphane BordasJ.M. Maciejowski
- Journals
- Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures (7 papers)Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (4 papers)The Aeronautical Journal (4 papers)International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (3 papers)Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Royal Academy of Engineering
253 papers receiving 6.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
- Civil and Structural Engineering 827
- Mechanics of Materials 824
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 302
- Geochemistry and Petrology 189
- Control and Systems Engineering 656
Countries citing scholars working at Royal Academy of Engineering
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Academy of Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Academy of Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Academy of Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Academy of Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering at the time of their publication.
About Royal Academy of Engineering
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering have published 307 papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 12 papers in Media Technology, 12 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 8 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and 2 papers in Architecture on the topics of Combustion and flame dynamics (9 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (8 papers), Power System Optimization and Stability (7 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (6 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (5 papers) and Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization (5 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Civil and Structural Engineering (827 citations), Mechanics of Materials (824 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (302 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (189 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (656 citations). Authors at Royal Academy of Engineering collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, The Aeronautical Journal, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering and Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Some of Royal Academy of Engineering's most productive authors include Emílio Custódio, Andrew Chilvers, Adisa Azapagic, Harish Kumar Jeswani, Brian Sheil, Eric C. Kerrigan, Stéphane Bordas, J.M. Maciejowski, Ronny Lesthaeghe and K. Glover.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.