Fairfax County Public Schools

6.7k citations
376 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fairfax County Public Schools

311 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Fairfax County Public Schools
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.3k
  • Education 1.8k
  • Safety Research 459
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 340
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 166
Replace Research for Action with:
Research for Action United States
Philadelphia Fire Department United States
State Board of Education United States
Thames Valley Children's Centre Canada
Columbus State Community College United States
St. Luke's Hospital United States
Danville Community College United States
Windsor Dermatology United States
Michael & Associates United States
Summit School United States
Fairfax County Public Schools relative to Research for Action United States Research for Action's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Research for Action · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fairfax County Public Schools

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fairfax County Public Schools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fairfax County Public Schools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fairfax County Public Schools more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fairfax County Public Schools

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fairfax County Public Schools at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fairfax County Public Schools at the time of their publication.

About Fairfax County Public Schools

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fairfax County Public Schools have published 376 papers, which have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 64 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 28 papers in Safety Research, 97 papers in Education, 52 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Occupational Therapy on the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (22 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (19 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (18 papers), Disability Education and Employment (17 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (17 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (16 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (14 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k citations), Education (1.8k citations), Safety Research (459 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (340 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (166 citations). Authors at Fairfax County Public Schools collaborate with scholars in United States, Pakistan and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Modern Language Journal, Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association and Journal of Counseling & Development. Some of Fairfax County Public Schools's most productive authors include Jon L. Almquist, Andrew E. Lincoln, Richard Y. Hinton, Margo A. Mastropieri, Thomas E. Scruggs, Shane V. Caswell, Reginald E. Dunn, Jorge R. Arias, Patricia S. Moyer and Judith A. Burry-Stock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact