Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone
Impact in
-
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 15
- Short Stories in Global Literature 12
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 7
- Themes in Literature Analysis 7
-
- Translation Studies and Practices 12
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 10
- Top scholars
- Jean‐Michel GanteauAmanda EdmondsPascale LeclercqHeather HiltonSusana OnegaPhilip CarrJudith Misrahi-BarakJohan Blomberg
- Journals
- Études anglaises (5 papers)Word & Image (2 papers)Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie (2 papers)ReCALL (1 paper)Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesEstonia
In The Last Decade
Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone
105 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Linguistics and Language 90
- Language and Linguistics 195
- Literature and Literary Theory 180
- Music 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
Countries citing scholars working at Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone at the time of their publication.
About Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone have published 247 papers, which have received a total of 629 indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 65 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 42 papers in Language and Linguistics, 15 papers in Linguistics and Language, 36 papers in Philosophy and 11 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts on the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (29 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (15 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (12 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (12 papers), French Language Learning Methods (11 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (10 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (7 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Language (90 citations), Language and Linguistics (195 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (180 citations), Music (34 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 citations). Authors at Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Estonia and have published in prestigious journals including Études anglaises, Word & Image, Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie, ReCALL and Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction. Some of Etudes montpelliéraines du monde anglophone's most productive authors include Jean‐Michel Ganteau, Amanda Edmonds, Pascale Leclercq, Heather Hilton, Susana Onega, Philip Carr, Judith Misrahi-Barak, Johan Blomberg, Jordan Zlatev and Sandrine SORLIN.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.