Early Manuscripts Electronic Library

547 papers receiving 13.1k citations

Peers

Early Manuscripts Electronic Library
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Geometry and Topology 903
  • Applied Mathematics 1.1k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 423
  • Catalysis 401
  • Surgery 2.2k
Replace University of California Office of the President with:
University of California Office of the President United States
Preston University United States
Advanced Projects Research Incorporated (United States) United States
Green Cross International United States
Evans Analytical Group (United States) United States
Scottsdale Community College United States
IR Dynamics (United States) United States
Lubbock Christian University United States
Martin Luther King, Jr. Multi-Service Ambulatory Care Center United States
Burnaby Hospital Canada
Early Manuscripts Electronic Library relative to University of California Office of the President United States University of California Office of the President's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36.5×
University of California Office of the President · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Manuscripts Electronic Library more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Early Manuscripts Electronic Library at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Early Manuscripts Electronic Library at the time of their publication.

About Early Manuscripts Electronic Library

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Early Manuscripts Electronic Library have published 642 papers, which have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 13 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 112 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Space and Planetary Science and 47 papers in Oncology on the topics of Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (32 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (26 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (20 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (15 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (9 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geometry and Topology (903 citations), Applied Mathematics (1.1k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (423 citations), Catalysis (401 citations) and Surgery (2.2k citations). Authors at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Pancreas, Medicine, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Shock. Some of Early Manuscripts Electronic Library's most productive authors include Arthur L. Besse, Jean-Yves Girard, Tonya DelSontro, Jake J. Beaulieu, John Downing, Marc N. Branch, Marc N. Potenza, Yvonne Yau, S. M. Manton and OW Tiegs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact