Decision Research
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 0.5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
-
- Risk Perception and Management
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
Papers in
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 211
-
- Risk Perception and Management 207
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 31
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 22
- Top scholars
- Paul SlovicBaruch FischhoffEllen M. PetersSarah LichtensteinAnthony LeiserowitzMelissa L. FinucaneDonald G. MacGregorC. K. Mertz
- Journals
- Risk Analysis (85 papers)Judgment and Decision Making (29 papers)Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (22 papers)Journal of Risk Research (22 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Decision Research
664 papers receiving 84.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
- General Decision Sciences 14k
- Sociology and Political Science 33.1k
- Family Practice 935
- Communication 3.1k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Decision Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Decision Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Decision Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Decision Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Decision Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Decision Research at the time of their publication.
About Decision Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Decision Research have published 676 papers, which have received a total of 85k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 211 papers in General Decision Sciences, 291 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 29 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 40 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (211 papers), Risk Perception and Management (207 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (31 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (25 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (18 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (14k citations), Sociology and Political Science (33.1k citations), Family Practice (935 citations), Communication (3.1k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (3.3k citations). Authors at Decision Research collaborate with scholars in United States, Sweden and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Risk Analysis, Judgment and Decision Making, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Journal of Risk Research and Frontiers in Psychology. Some of Decision Research's most productive authors include Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Ellen M. Peters, Sarah Lichtenstein, Anthony Leiserowitz, Melissa L. Finucane, Donald G. MacGregor, C. K. Mertz, Olsson Västfjäll D and Robin Gregory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.