Department of Physiological Sciences

150.5k citations
4.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Department of Physiological Sciences

3.9k papers receiving 147.4k citations

Peers

Department of Physiological Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 21.5k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 6.6k
  • Molecular Biology 51.2k
  • Physiology 19.0k
  • Cell Biology 10.3k
Replace Bioengineering Center with:
Bioengineering Center Russia
Kuopio University Hospital Finland
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland Finland
Tampere University Hospital Finland
Folkhälsans Forskningscentrum Finland
Helsinki Children's Hospital Finland
Turku Centre for Biotechnology Finland
Science for Life Laboratory Sweden
Integrated Cardio Metabolic Centre Sweden
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics Poland
Department of Physiological Sciences relative to Bioengineering Center Russia Bioengineering Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Bioengineering Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Department of Physiological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Department of Physiological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Department of Physiological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Department of Physiological Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Department of Physiological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Department of Physiological Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Department of Physiological Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Department of Physiological Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Department of Physiological Sciences have published 4.2k papers, which have received a total of 150.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 497 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 151 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, 572 papers in Physiology, 30 papers in Equine and 64 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (226 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (199 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (126 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (111 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (95 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (91 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (89 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (83 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (21.5k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (6.6k citations), Molecular Biology (51.2k citations), Physiology (19.0k citations) and Cell Biology (10.3k citations). Authors at Department of Physiological Sciences collaborate with scholars in Russia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Immunology, Brain Research, Journal of Neurophysiology, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Applied Physiology. Some of Department of Physiological Sciences's most productive authors include Walter M. Fitch, James G. Tidball, Vishva M. Dixit, Lewis S. Seiden, Roland R. Roy, Manel Esteller, V. Reggie Edgerton, Ancel Keys, Kim Newton and R. J. Miller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact