University of Trento

1.0M citations
38.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Trento

34.8k papers receiving 978.9k citations

Peers

University of Trento
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84.4k
  • Media Technology 36.5k
  • Ceramics and Composites 18.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 94.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 99.7k
Replace University of Padua with:
University of Padua Italy
University of Pisa Italy
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Germany
University of Pavia Italy
University of Freiburg Germany
University of Genoa Italy
Université Grenoble Alpes France
Technical University of Munich Germany
University of Stuttgart Germany
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Germany
University of Trento relative to University of Padua Italy University of Padua's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
University of Padua · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Trento

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Trento. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Trento with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Trento more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Trento

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Trento at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Trento at the time of their publication.

About University of Trento

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Trento have published 38.8k papers, which have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.9k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 89 papers in Computational Mathematics, 797 papers in Ceramics and Composites, 4.2k papers in Artificial Intelligence and 188 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (750 papers), Topic Modeling (655 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (629 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (604 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (600 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (541 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (519 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (509 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (84.4k citations), Media Technology (36.5k citations), Ceramics and Composites (18.6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (94.2k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (99.7k citations). Authors at University of Trento collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review A, Scientific Reports, Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing and PLoS ONE. Some of University of Trento's most productive authors include Lorenzo Bruzzone, S. Stringari, Roberto Battiti, Gøsta Esping‐Andersen, Silvia Gherardi, Eleuterio Francisco Toro, Lorenzo Pavesi, Iacopo Carusotto, Nicu Sebe and Davide Geneletti.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact