Concordia University Wisconsin

22.5k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Concordia University Wisconsin

1.0k papers receiving 20.0k citations

Peers

Concordia University Wisconsin
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 1.1k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.1k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 284
  • Small Animals 627
  • Strategy and Management 1.2k
Replace Truman State University with:
Truman State University United States
Indiana University Northwest United States
Chicago State University United States
Kalamazoo College United States
University of Wisconsin–River Falls United States
University of Southern Indiana United States
Pathways Behavioral Services United States
Hanover College United States
Winston-Salem State University United States
Ferris State University United States
Concordia University Wisconsin relative to Truman State University United States Truman State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.4×
Truman State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Concordia University Wisconsin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Concordia University Wisconsin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Concordia University Wisconsin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concordia University Wisconsin more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Concordia University Wisconsin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Concordia University Wisconsin at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Concordia University Wisconsin at the time of their publication.

About Concordia University Wisconsin

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Concordia University Wisconsin have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 22.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 163 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 57 papers in Small Animals, 16 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 31 papers in Waste Management and Disposal and 36 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (108 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (43 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (36 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (35 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (31 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (28 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (20 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (1.1k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (2.1k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (284 citations), Small Animals (627 citations) and Strategy and Management (1.2k citations). Authors at Concordia University Wisconsin collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Poultry Science, Electronics Letters and Engenharia Agrícola. Some of Concordia University Wisconsin's most productive authors include Teresa M Steffen, LOUISE A. MOLLINGER, Timothy A. Hacker, Sarah J. Freeman, Chris DeBresson, Fernand Amesse, David A. Waldman, Arlei Coldebella, Abhay Singh Chauhan and Joseph E. McGraw.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact