University Centre of Legal Medicine

1.1k papers receiving 22.2k citations

Peers

University Centre of Legal Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Toxicology 1.7k
  • Health Informatics 289
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 2.4k
  • Emergency Medicine 1.2k
  • Pharmacology 2.3k
Replace Laboratoire National de Santé with:
Laboratoire National de Santé Luxembourg
Medical Research Foundation United Kingdom
Home Office United Kingdom
Netherlands Forensic Institute Netherlands
Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg Belgium
Wellcome Library United Kingdom
Research Institute of Health Sciences Spain
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Africaines France
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 Italy
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research Austria
University Centre of Legal Medicine relative to Laboratoire National de Santé Luxembourg Laboratoire National de Santé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48.2×
Laboratoire National de Santé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University Centre of Legal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University Centre of Legal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University Centre of Legal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University Centre of Legal Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University Centre of Legal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University Centre of Legal Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University Centre of Legal Medicine at the time of their publication.

About University Centre of Legal Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University Centre of Legal Medicine have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 25.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 96 papers in Toxicology, 86 papers in Emergency Medicine, 14 papers in Health Informatics, 170 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 85 papers in Archeology on the topics of Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (146 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (96 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (88 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (65 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (62 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (60 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (49 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Toxicology (1.7k citations), Health Informatics (289 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (2.4k citations), Emergency Medicine (1.2k citations) and Pharmacology (2.3k citations). Authors at University Centre of Legal Medicine collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Drug Testing and Analysis, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology and Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Some of University Centre of Legal Medicine's most productive authors include Patrice Mangin, Cristian Palmière, Bernice S. Elger, Martial Saugy, Aurélien Thomas, Marc Augsburger, Silke Grabherr, Christian Staub, Tiia Kuuranne and Vincent Varlet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact