Center for the Study of Democracy

6.4k citations
463 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Center for the Study of Democracy

333 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Center for the Study of Democracy
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Communication 699
  • Political Science and International Relations 2.3k
  • Development 242
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.9k
  • Public Administration 182
Replace National Centre for Social research with:
National Centre for Social research Greece
Institute of Economics Zagreb Croatia
Institute of National Economy Romania
Institute of Educational Policy Greece
Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship Italy
Institute for Social Research Croatia
International Business School Hungary
Institute of Political Studies Poland
Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies Italy
Institute for Migration Research Croatia
Center for the Study of Democracy relative to National Centre for Social research Greece National Centre for Social research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
National Centre for Social research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for the Study of Democracy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for the Study of Democracy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for the Study of Democracy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for the Study of Democracy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for the Study of Democracy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for the Study of Democracy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for the Study of Democracy at the time of their publication.

About Center for the Study of Democracy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for the Study of Democracy have published 463 papers, which have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 168 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 37 papers in Communication, 193 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Development and 20 papers in Law on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (40 papers), Social Media and Politics (30 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (22 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (21 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (11 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Communication (699 citations), Political Science and International Relations (2.3k citations), Development (242 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.9k citations) and Public Administration (182 citations). Authors at Center for the Study of Democracy collaborate with scholars in Bulgaria, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Swiss Political Science Review, Presidential Studies Quarterly, British Journal of Political Science, Journal of Legislative Studies and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Center for the Study of Democracy's most productive authors include David Chandler, Nico Carpentier, Basil Bornemann, Jan-Peter Voß, Christian Welzel, Chantal Mouffe, Jeff Chester, Kathryn C. Montgomery, Russell J. Dalton and Amy C. Alexander.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact