Embrapa Acre

7.5k citations
467 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pasture and Agricultural Systems 21
    • Genetics and Plant Breeding 42
    • Growth and nutrition in plants 39

Embrapa Acre

441 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

Embrapa Acre
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Forestry 819
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 949
  • Environmental Engineering 755
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Horticulture 30
Replace Embrapa Rondônia with:
Embrapa Rondônia Brazil
Center for International Forestry Research Peru
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá Brazil
Gabriel René Moreno Autonomous University Bolivia
Instituto Sinchi Colombia
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril Brazil
Embrapa Pantanal Brazil
Embrapa Roraima Brazil
Universidad Regional Amazónica IKIAM Ecuador
Amazon National University of Madre de Dios Peru
Embrapa Acre relative to Embrapa Rondônia Brazil Embrapa Rondônia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.2×
Embrapa Rondônia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Acre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Acre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Acre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Acre more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Acre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Acre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Acre at the time of their publication.

About Embrapa Acre

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Acre have published 467 papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Forestry, 184 papers in Plant Science, 40 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 40 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 36 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Genetics and Plant Breeding (42 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (39 papers), Forest ecology and management (34 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (30 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (25 papers), Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques (22 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (21 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (819 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (949 citations), Environmental Engineering (755 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations) and Horticulture (30 citations). Authors at Embrapa Acre collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Forest Ecology and Management, Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Ciência Florestal and Ciência e Agrotecnologia. Some of Embrapa Acre's most productive authors include L. H. de O. Wadt, Marcus V.N. d'Oliveira, J. F. Valentim, Karen A. Kainer, Christina Lynn Staudhammer, Rachael Devorah Garrett, Daisy A. P. Gomes-Silva, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec and C. M. S. de Andrade.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact