Centre Paul Albert-Février

4.5k citations
289 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 26
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 24
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 16

Centre Paul Albert-Février

206 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

Centre Paul Albert-Février
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Software 342
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 748
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 409
  • Hardware and Architecture 187
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 446
Replace Italian Resuscitation Council with:
Italian Resuscitation Council Italy
Fondazione Politecnico di Milano Italy
Ferioli & Gianotti (Italy) Italy
Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique France
Ascom (Switzerland) Switzerland
Sardegna Ricerche (Italy) Italy
Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques France
XLAB (Slovenia) Slovenia
Protestant University of Applied Sciences Freiburg Germany
Tamedia (Switzerland) Switzerland
Centre Paul Albert-Février relative to Italian Resuscitation Council Italy Italian Resuscitation Council's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Italian Resuscitation Council · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centre Paul Albert-Février

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre Paul Albert-Février. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre Paul Albert-Février with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre Paul Albert-Février more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centre Paul Albert-Février

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février at the time of their publication.

About Centre Paul Albert-Février

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février have published 289 papers, which have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 31 papers in Religious studies, 51 papers in Archeology, 40 papers in Anthropology, 10 papers in Classics and 10 papers in Software on the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (26 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (25 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (24 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (17 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (16 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (11 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (10 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Software (342 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (748 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (409 citations), Hardware and Architecture (187 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (446 citations). Authors at Centre Paul Albert-Février collaborate with scholars in France, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Psychology, Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Memory & Cognition and Population Space and Place. Some of Centre Paul Albert-Février's most productive authors include Frédéric Jurie, Bill Triggs, Éric Nowak, Jonathan Grainger, Sofie Schoonbaert, Laurent Voisin, Michael J. Butler, Thai Son Hoang, Jean-Raymond Abrial and Farhad Mehta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact