Centre Paul Albert-Février

4.4k citations
296 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 8
    • Cultural Identity and Heritage 6
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 7

Centre Paul Albert-Février

230 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Centre Paul Albert-Février
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Software 142
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 433
  • Family Practice 42
  • Global and Planetary Change 478
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 360
Replace SurgiMedia (France) with:
SurgiMedia (France) France
A.S. Watson (Netherlands) Netherlands
Italian Resuscitation Council Italy
Pitney Bowes (France) France
Zürcher Fachhochschule Switzerland
Citrix (Switzerland) Switzerland
International Society of Nephrology Belgium
Predict (France) France
Institut National Universitaire Jean-François Champollion France
Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique France
Centre Paul Albert-Février relative to SurgiMedia (France) France SurgiMedia (France)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
SurgiMedia (France) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centre Paul Albert-Février

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre Paul Albert-Février. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre Paul Albert-Février with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre Paul Albert-Février more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centre Paul Albert-Février

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février at the time of their publication.

About Centre Paul Albert-Février

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre Paul Albert-Février have published 296 papers, which have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 27 papers in Archeology, 18 papers in Anthropology, 6 papers in Classics, 8 papers in Religious studies and 9 papers in Urban Studies on the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (15 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (11 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (8 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (8 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (7 papers) and Cultural Identity and Heritage (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Software (142 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (433 citations), Family Practice (42 citations), Global and Planetary Change (478 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (360 citations). Authors at Centre Paul Albert-Février collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, EuroIntervention, Biopreservation and Biobanking, International Journal of Psychology and Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. Some of Centre Paul Albert-Février's most productive authors include Jonathan Grainger, Sofie Schoonbaert, Dante D. Dixson, Frank C. Worrell, Eliane Fuseau, Hélène Giraudo, Robert E. Hewitt, Élyette Roux, Aurélie Kessous and Thai Son Hoang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact