Cohortes épidémiologiques en population

13.8k citations
625 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Cohortes épidémiologiques en population

553 papers receiving 13.8k citations

Peers

Cohortes épidémiologiques en population
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Occupational Therapy 735
  • Health 815
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 251
  • Periodontics 393
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
Replace Farr Institute with:
Farr Institute United Kingdom
East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom
Wessex Institute of Technology United Kingdom
Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice France
Troubles du comportement alimentaire de l'adolescent France
Arthritis UK United Kingdom
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Germany
NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre United Kingdom
l'Assurance Maladie France
St Michael’s Hospital Ireland
Cohortes épidémiologiques en population relative to Farr Institute United Kingdom Farr Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.0×
Farr Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cohortes épidémiologiques en population

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cohortes épidémiologiques en population. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cohortes épidémiologiques en population with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cohortes épidémiologiques en population more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cohortes épidémiologiques en population

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cohortes épidémiologiques en population at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cohortes épidémiologiques en population at the time of their publication.

About Cohortes épidémiologiques en population

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cohortes épidémiologiques en population have published 625 papers, which have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 82 papers in Occupational Therapy, 33 papers in Health, 69 papers in General Health Professions, 41 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 10 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology on the topics of Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces (77 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (50 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (42 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (31 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (25 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (25 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (22 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy (735 citations), Health (815 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (251 citations), Periodontics (393 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations). Authors at Cohortes épidémiologiques en population collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Occupational and Environmental Medicine, PLoS ONE, European Journal of Public Health, Scientific Reports and Environment International. Some of Cohortes épidémiologiques en population's most productive authors include Marie Zins, Marcel Goldberg, Alexis Descatha, Deborah Gustafson, Amanda J. Kiliaan, Sébastien Czernichow, Ilse A.C. Arnoldussen, Yves Roquelaure, Annette Leclerc and Cédric Lemogne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact