Australian Tropical Herbarium

7.5k citations
278 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Australian Tropical Herbarium

271 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

Australian Tropical Herbarium
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.3k
  • Ecological Modeling 302
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
  • Plant Science 1.9k
  • Genetics 1.1k
Replace Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority with:
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Australia
Australian National Herbarium Australia
State Herbarium of South Australia Australia
Australian National Wildlife Collection Australia
Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre Australia
Zoos Victoria Australia
Phillip Island Nature Parks Australia
Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions Australia
Institut de sciences exactes et appliquées New Caledonia
Forestry Tasmania Australia
Australian Tropical Herbarium relative to Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Australia Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.8×
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Australian Tropical Herbarium

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian Tropical Herbarium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian Tropical Herbarium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Tropical Herbarium more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Australian Tropical Herbarium

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian Tropical Herbarium at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian Tropical Herbarium at the time of their publication.

About Australian Tropical Herbarium

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian Tropical Herbarium have published 278 papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 150 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 33 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 6 papers in Ecological Modeling, 78 papers in Plant Science and 1 paper in Horticulture on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (109 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (54 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (36 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (34 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (30 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (14 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (302 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations), Plant Science (1.9k citations) and Genetics (1.1k citations). Authors at Australian Tropical Herbarium collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Systematic Botany, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Journal of Biogeography, Frontiers in Plant Science and Australian Journal of Botany. Some of Australian Tropical Herbarium's most productive authors include Darren M. Crayn, Andrew H. Thornhill, Joseph T. Miller, Katharina Schulte, Michael Douglas Crisp, Georg Zizka, Mark G. Harrington, Shawn William Laffan, Brent D. Mishler and Craig M. Costion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact