Embrapa Solos

21.9k citations
924 papers ·

Impact in

    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield
    • Soil and Environmental Studies
    • Agricultural Science and Fertilization
    • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping

Papers in

    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 166
    • Soil and Environmental Studies 98
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield 79
    • Agricultural Science and Fertilization 48
    • Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques 40
    • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping 105

Embrapa Solos

876 papers receiving 21.8k citations

Peers

Embrapa Solos
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Soil Science 6.9k
  • Environmental Engineering 4.9k
  • Pollution 1.1k
  • Forestry 347
  • Ecology 1.9k
Replace Embrapa Meio Ambiente with:
Embrapa Meio Ambiente Brazil
Embrapa Agrobiology Brazil
Embrapa Southeastern Livestock Brazil
Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz Brazil
Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais Brazil
Centro de Tecnologia Mineral Brazil
Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources Brazil
Instituto Florestal Brazil
Embrapa Coastal Tablelands Brazil
Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Norte de Minas Gerais Brazil
Embrapa Solos relative to Embrapa Meio Ambiente Brazil Embrapa Meio Ambiente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Embrapa Meio Ambiente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Solos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Solos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Solos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Solos more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Solos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Solos at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Solos at the time of their publication.

About Embrapa Solos

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Solos have published 924 papers, which have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 403 papers in Soil Science, 123 papers in Environmental Engineering, 17 papers in Forestry, 27 papers in Waste Management and Disposal and 46 papers in Pollution on the topics of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (166 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (105 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (98 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (79 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (48 papers), Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques (40 papers), Heavy metals in environment (39 papers) and Soil and Land Suitability Analysis (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (6.9k citations), Environmental Engineering (4.9k citations), Pollution (1.1k citations), Forestry (347 citations) and Ecology (1.9k citations). Authors at Embrapa Solos collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Geoderma, CATENA and Scientia Agricola. Some of Embrapa Solos's most productive authors include Maria de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos, Alex B. McBratney, Budiman Minasny, E. H. Novotny, V. de M. Benites, P. L. O. A. Machado, Beata Emöke Madari, Fabiano de Carvalho Balieiro, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira and Gustavo M. Vasques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact