Charlottesville Medical Research

58.6k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Charlottesville Medical Research

1.5k papers receiving 52.6k citations

Peers

Charlottesville Medical Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Immunology and Allergy 2.6k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 2.3k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.4k
  • Surgery 8.1k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 3.0k
Replace Institute of Clinical Research with:
Institute of Clinical Research United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences United States
Hershey (United States) United States
Sabin Vaccine Institute United States
Hotel Dieu Hospital Canada
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center United States
St. Christopher's Hospital for Children United States
Ohio State University Hospital United States
The Bronx Defenders United States
St. Joseph's Hospital Canada
Charlottesville Medical Research relative to Institute of Clinical Research United States Institute of Clinical Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Institute of Clinical Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Charlottesville Medical Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Charlottesville Medical Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Charlottesville Medical Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlottesville Medical Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Charlottesville Medical Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Charlottesville Medical Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Charlottesville Medical Research at the time of their publication.

About Charlottesville Medical Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Charlottesville Medical Research have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 58.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 45 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 46 papers in Immunology and Allergy, 325 papers in Surgery, 36 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 95 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism on the topics of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (33 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (32 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (30 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (24 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (23 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (23 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (22 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (2.6k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (2.3k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (1.4k citations), Surgery (8.1k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (3.0k citations). Authors at Charlottesville Medical Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Laryngoscope and Annals of Internal Medicine. Some of Charlottesville Medical Research's most productive authors include Thomas A.E. Platts‐Mills, Martin D. Chapman, Milton T. Edgerton, Oswald Steward, Klaus F. Ley, James G. Carrier, B. Jill Venton, Edwin W. Rubel, Cassandra L. Fraser and Alexander Zarbock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact