California Lutheran University

12.0k citations
732 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

California Lutheran University

616 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

California Lutheran University
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 739
  • Business and International Management 191
  • Communication 554
  • Clinical Psychology 1.4k
Replace University of La Verne with:
University of La Verne United States
Saint Mary's College of California United States
Point Loma Nazarene University United States
Saybrook University United States
Community Partners United States
Scripps College United States
California State University, Channel Islands United States
Whittier College United States
Southern Utah University United States
Grand Canyon University United States
California Lutheran University relative to University of La Verne United States University of La Verne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
University of La Verne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at California Lutheran University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California Lutheran University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California Lutheran University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Lutheran University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at California Lutheran University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California Lutheran University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California Lutheran University at the time of their publication.

About California Lutheran University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with California Lutheran University have published 732 papers, which have received a total of 12.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11 papers in General Psychology, 34 papers in Communication, 89 papers in Clinical Psychology, 75 papers in Social Psychology and 36 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (25 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (17 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (17 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (17 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Sports Performance and Training (15 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (739 citations), Business and International Management (191 citations), Communication (554 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations). Authors at California Lutheran University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Volta Review, European J of International Management, Virology Journal and Electrophoresis. Some of California Lutheran University's most productive authors include Vlad Vaiman, William B. Gartner, Ted Baker, Friederike Welter, David Bruce Audretsch, Fred A. Rosenberg, Sharla Berry, William A. Sands, Peter R. Barker and Grady Hanrahan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact