Climate Analytics
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Climate variability and models
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Papers in
-
- Climate variability and models 87
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 70
-
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 119
- Top scholars
- Carl-Friedrich SchleussnerBill HareJoeri RogeljMichiel SchaefferReto KnuttiMalte Alexander MeinshausenKatja FrielerMyles R. Allen
- Journals
- Environmental Research Letters (29 papers)Nature Climate Change (24 papers)Climate Policy (19 papers)Nature Communications (16 papers)Earth System Dynamics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Climate Analytics
365 papers receiving 22.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Global and Planetary Change 10.1k
- Atmospheric Science 3.9k
- Environmental Engineering 3.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 5.2k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 2.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Climate Analytics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Climate Analytics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Climate Analytics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Climate Analytics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Climate Analytics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Climate Analytics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Climate Analytics at the time of their publication.
About Climate Analytics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Climate Analytics have published 410 papers, which have received a total of 24.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 190 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 131 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 65 papers in Atmospheric Science, 44 papers in Environmental Engineering and 38 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis on the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (119 papers), Climate variability and models (87 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (70 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (45 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (34 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (31 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (31 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (10.1k citations), Atmospheric Science (3.9k citations), Environmental Engineering (3.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (5.2k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (2.9k citations). Authors at Climate Analytics collaborate with scholars in Germany, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Research Letters, Nature Climate Change, Climate Policy, Nature Communications and Earth System Dynamics. Some of Climate Analytics's most productive authors include Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Bill Hare, Joeri Rogelj, Michiel Schaeffer, Reto Knutti, Malte Alexander Meinshausen, Katja Frieler, Myles R. Allen, Jürgen Scheffran and Nicolai Meinshausen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.