Citigroup
Impact in
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Finance 176
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 65
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 39
- Stochastic processes and financial applications 35
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations 31
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 30
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 54
- Top scholars
- G. Lynn ShostackHenning U. VossJ. Austin CottrellThomas J.R. HughesYuri BazilevsGerard HobergGordon M. PhillipsStanley Fischer
- Journals
- Medicine (21 papers)The Journal of Portfolio Management (14 papers)Quantitative Finance (10 papers)IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (8 papers)Nurse Educator (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Citigroup
1.2k papers receiving 29.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
- Finance 4.8k
- Accounting 4.8k
- Marketing 1.8k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.8k
- Strategy and Management 2.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Citigroup
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Citigroup. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Citigroup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Citigroup more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Citigroup
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Citigroup at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Citigroup at the time of their publication.
About Citigroup
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Citigroup have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 33.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 176 papers in Finance, 77 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 98 papers in Accounting, 200 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Computational Mathematics on the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (65 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (54 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (48 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (39 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (35 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (31 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (30 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Finance (4.8k citations), Accounting (4.8k citations), Marketing (1.8k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.8k citations) and Strategy and Management (2.5k citations). Authors at Citigroup collaborate with scholars in United States, France and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Quantitative Finance, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing and Nurse Educator. Some of Citigroup's most productive authors include G. Lynn Shostack, Henning U. Voss, J. Austin Cottrell, Thomas J.R. Hughes, Yuri Bazilevs, Gerard Hoberg, Gordon M. Phillips, Stanley Fischer, John Y. Campbell and Glen B. Taksler.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.