Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- International Business and FDI
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Firm Innovation and Growth
Papers in
-
- Global trade and economics 52
-
- Firm Innovation and Growth 36
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 34
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth 25
- Top scholars
- Shih‐Fang LoDaigee ShawJiann-Chyuan WangKuen‐Hung TsaiYung-Jaan LeeShang-Jin WeiXiaobo ZhangChien‐Hsun Chen
- Journals
- Research in Developmental Disabilities (25 papers)Sustainability (18 papers)Research in Autism (9 papers)Research Policy (7 papers)Economic Modelling (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
399 papers receiving 10.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
- Strategy and Management 2.6k
- Economics and Econometrics 3.7k
- Accounting 1.4k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.0k
- Management Science and Operations Research 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research at the time of their publication.
About Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research have published 435 papers, which have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 68 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 188 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 89 papers in Strategy and Management, 30 papers in Finance and 34 papers in Accounting on the topics of Global trade and economics (52 papers), International Business and FDI (41 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (36 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (34 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (31 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (26 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (26 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Strategy and Management (2.6k citations), Economics and Econometrics (3.7k citations), Accounting (1.4k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.0k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.1k citations). Authors at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Research in Developmental Disabilities, Sustainability, Research in Autism, Research Policy and Economic Modelling. Some of Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research's most productive authors include Shih‐Fang Lo, Daigee Shaw, Jiann-Chyuan Wang, Kuen‐Hung Tsai, Yung-Jaan Lee, Shang-Jin Wei, Xiaobo Zhang, Chien‐Hsun Chen, Meng‐Chun Liu and Tser‐Yieth Chen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.