International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Marine and fisheries research
- Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Papers in
-
- Marine and fisheries research 118
- Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies 72
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 44
- Top scholars
- Keith BranderÁrni MagnússonAnders NielsenMartin MächlerKasper KristensenJames S. HansVictor M. Eguı́luzPeter C. Austin
- Journals
- ICES Journal of Marine Science (56 papers)CMAJ Open (15 papers)Marine Policy (11 papers)Fish and Fisheries (9 papers)Canadian Medical Association Journal (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
399 papers receiving 23.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.9k
- Global and Planetary Change 7.8k
- Ecology 8.1k
- Oceanography 2.7k
- Ecological Modeling 829
Countries citing scholars working at International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Council for the Exploration of the Sea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Council for the Exploration of the Sea more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Council for the Exploration of the Sea at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Council for the Exploration of the Sea at the time of their publication.
About International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Council for the Exploration of the Sea have published 462 papers, which have received a total of 24.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 143 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 47 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 47 papers in Oceanography, 45 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 72 papers in Ecology on the topics of Marine and fisheries research (118 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (72 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (44 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (43 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (33 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (21 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (17 papers) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (7.8k citations), Ecology (8.1k citations), Oceanography (2.7k citations) and Ecological Modeling (829 citations). Authors at International Council for the Exploration of the Sea collaborate with scholars in Denmark, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including ICES Journal of Marine Science, CMAJ Open, Marine Policy, Fish and Fisheries and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Some of International Council for the Exploration of the Sea's most productive authors include Keith Brander, Árni Magnússon, Anders Nielsen, Martin Mächler, Kasper Kristensen, James S. Hans, Victor M. Eguı́luz, Peter C. Austin, Mark Dickey‐Collas and Konstantin Klemm.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.